Developing the Historical Literacy Skills of Adolescents Who Struggle with Reading and Writing: Group and Individual Responses to Instruction

Daniel Wissinger, Becky A Knickelbein, George Bieger

Abstract

This investigation examined the effectiveness of two instructional approaches for enhancing historical reading and writing outcomes among 39 students who were identified with specific learning disabilities or at-risk for academic failure. Students participated in three, week-long historical investigations. Experimental groups were taught two historically-related schemes and critical questions, while comparison groups used traditional instructional methods. Results indicated that although the instructional approach did not significantly influence students’ historical knowledge, the experimental model enhanced historical writing skills. 

Keywords

Struggling readers and writers, historical writing

Full Text:

PDF

References

Allington, R. L. (2012). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research- based programs (3rd Ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Bagert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Review ofEducational Research, 74 (1), 20-58.

Bulgren, J., Deschler, D.D., & Lenz, K. (2007). Engaging adolescents with LD in higher orderthinking about history concepts using integrated content enhancement routines. Journal of Learning Disabilities 40 (2), 121-133.

Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. (2010). Time to act. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects (2010). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. Accessed July 7, 2014. http://www.corestandards.org/.

De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology 97: 137-56.

De La Paz, S., & Felton, M. (2010). Reading and writing from multiple source documents in history: Effects of strategy instruction with low to average high school writers. Journal of Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 174-192.

De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1997). Strategy instruction in planning: Effects on the writing performance and behavior of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 167-181.

Jonassen, D.H. & Kim, B. (2010). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justification and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 439-457.

MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., Dreyer, L. G., & Hughes, K. E. (2002). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Test, 4th Edition (GMRT-4). Riverside Publishing Company (division of Houghton Mifflin).

Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96-107.

Monte-Sano, C. (2010). Disciplinary literacy in history: An exploration of the historical nature of adolescents’ writing. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19 (4), 539-568.

Monte-Sano, C. & De La Paz, S. (2012). Using writing tasks to elicit adolescents’ historical reasoning, Journal of Literacy Research, 44(3), 273-299.

Monte-Sano, C., De La Paz, S., & Felton, M. (2014). Reading, thinking and writing about history: Teaching argument writing to diverse learners. New York: Teachers College. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2005). The condition of education. Washington, DC: NCES.

Nystrand, M. (2006). Research in the role of classroom discourse as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 40, 392-412.

Pennsylvania System of School Assessments – Technical Report (2012). Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Department of Education.

Psychological Corporation. (2009) Wechsler Individual Achievement Test – Third Edition (WIAT-III). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40-59.

Wissinger, D. & De La Paz, S. (2015). Effects of critical discussions on middle school students’ written historical arguments. Journal of Education Psychology, May 11, 17.



Categories: 2017, Articles, Urban Education

Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: