Laura Tamassia, Renaat Frans
Abstract
In Flanders, a choice has been made for the integrated school subject ‘Natural Sciences’, in ‘science for all’ secondary school trajectories, and for the three separate subjects biology, physics and chemistry, in trajectories for the future scientist and technician.
In the framework of the Flemish project ‘Practice-oriented reviews of research in subject matter teaching’, we have performed a study with the aim of investigating, on the basis of the existing literature, whether there is currently any scientific evidence that the integration of biology, chemistry and physics in the secondary school subject Natural Sciences improves student results for scientific literacy. The followed methodology is based on the general principles of the systematic review, but with the final goal of producing a text useful for teacher educators, teacher students and teachers, and not a technical review only readable by researchers in science education. The main result of this study is that there is currently no scientific evidence of the effectiveness of integration for scientific literacy. The main conclusion for practice is that integration alone does ‘no magic’. This implies that intellectual freedom remains for teachers and teacher educators within the framework of the subject Natural Sciences on how to structure instruction. In the light of this, we stress the importance of educating future teachers to be aware of the current debate and to form their own opinion.
Keywords
science education, scientific literacy, integrated science
Full Text:
References
Åström, M. (2008). Defining integrated science education and putting it to test. PhD Thesis, Linköping University, Sweden, Faculty of Educational Sciences.
Åström, M. (2007). Integrated and subject specific. An empirical exploration in Swedish compulsory schools. Licentiate of Philosophy Thesis, Linköping University, Sweden, Faculty of Educational Sciences.
Abrahams, I. a. (2010). Untangling what teachers mean by the motivational value of practical work. School Science Review , 92, 111-‐115.
Czerniak, C. (2007). Interdisciplinary science teaching. In S. a. Abell, Handbook of research on science education (pp. 537-‐560).
Eurydice. (n.d.). Belgium (Flemish Community). Retrieved June 30, 2012, from Eurypedia: webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/eurydice/index.php/Belgium-‐ Flemish-‐Community:Overview
Eurydice. (2011). Science education in Europe: National policies, practices and research.
Lederman, N. a. (1997, February). Integrated, interdisciplinary, or thematic Instruction? Is this a question or is it questionable semantics? School Science and Mathematics .
Murphy P., W. E. (2006). Girls in the Physics Classroom -‐ A Review of the Research on the Participation of Girls in Physics. Institute of Physics, The Open University. Institute of Physics.
OECD. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/
OECD. (n.d.). PISA sample questions. Retrieved from http://pisa-‐sq.acer.edu.au/ OECD. (2003). Scientific Literacy. Retrieved from The PISA 2003 assessment
framework -‐ Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge
and Skills. From http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/29/33707226.pdf Project P-‐review, School of Education -‐ Association KU Leuven. (2013). P-‐reviews
-‐ Onderzoek koppelen aan je vak. Retrieved from http://www.p-‐reviews.be/ TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. (2011). Retrieved from
Categories: 2014, Articles - JETEN, Language Education
ETEN Journal 
Leave a Reply