The Swimming Pool. The Teachers Role in the Didactics of Dialogue School, Using Godly Play

Tom Schoemaker, Fedor de Beer

Abstract

In regard to guiding a child in his own life philosophical development, a research-group of HAN University designed the didactic principles of Dialogue School. In this project different ideas and methods were tried and researched. This article looks at the possibilities and problems teachers face, using the method of Godly Play as a part of the Dialogue School didactics. The teacher has to learn to let go, to understand symbolic communication, to create a safe and relaxed learning environment, to combine various subjects and, most of all, to really communicate with every single pupil.

Keywords

Life philosophical development, Godly Play, Dialogue School, storytelling

Full Text:

PDF

References

Berryman, J. (2003). The Complete Guide to Godly Play, Vol. 4: An Imaginative Method for Presenting Scripture Stories to Children. Denver: Morehouse Education Resources.

Berryman, J.W. (20092). Teaching Godly Play. How to mentor the Spiritual Development of Children. Denver, Morehouse Education Resources.

Berryman, J., & Hyde, B. (2010). A game to be played; play and authority in religious education. Journal of Religious Education 58 (3), pp. 35-43.

Black, J. (2011). Godly Play in the Primary Classroom? Oxford: Farmington Trust, visited September 27th, 2014 at http://www.farmington.ac.uk/documents/2011_reports/TT269.JBlack.pdf.

Fowler, J.W. (1981). Stages of Faith: The Psychology of Human Development and the Quest for Meaning. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

Ganzevoort, R. (2005). De hand van God en andere verhalen. Praktische theologie als hermeneutiek van de geleefde religie. Amsterdam, VU University.

Ganzevoort, R. (2007). De wijsheid op straat… Levensbeschouwing en hermeneutische communicatie van professionals in een plurale context. Zwolle: Windesheim University of Applied Sciences.

Hyde, B. (2010). Agency and non-verbal communication in religious education: a case study from a Godly Play classroom. Journal of Religious Education 58 (1), pp. 4–11.

Oosterheert, I. (2007). Leren over leren. Groningen/Houten: Wolters Noordhof.

Ricoeur, P. (1991). Tekst en betekenis: opstellen over de interpretatie van literatuur. Amsterdam, Ambo.

Roebben, B. (2007). Godsdienstpedagogiek van de hoop. Leuven, Acco.

Schoemaker, T. (2004). Het verhaal als geloofscommunicatie. In P. Hendriks & T. Schoemaker, Het Hemels Gelag. Zoetermeer:, Boekencentrum, pp. 201-209.

Schoemaker, T. (2011). Midden in de week… maar zondags niet. Gorinchem: Narratio.

Schoemaker, T. (2013). De Lichtstad. Arnhem: HAN.

Schoemaker, T (2014). “Here the snowman could live, but he missed everyone” Recognizing the life-philosophical dimension in a child’s creative writing and aiding the child to develop. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 9, pp. 22-32.

Vansiegeleghem, N. (2006). Gesprek als grenservaring. Gent: Universiteit Gent.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.



Categories: 2016, Articles, Identity & Diversity

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: